Ellen Boughn and the Future of Stock Photography

John: Ellen, you have been in the forefront of themarket, composed of mom and pop businesses
stock world as far back as I remember.  I firstneeding an image for a newspaper advertisement,
met you in the late 80’s. You ownedstudents in need of a photograph for a
After-Image, the first stock agency to carry myhomework assignment, or a church group in need
work. You sold After-Image to Tony Stone. Sinceof a picture for a flyer, is only a fraction of that
that time you have broadened your range ofsize, it is still a huge market.  Perhaps those
experience in a number of ways.  Can you catchbuyers will end up at a Micro site, or perhaps, with
us up to date on that range of experience?a Google search, they may end up at a
Ellen: One of my earliest memories of you, John,photographer’s site.  Do you think this is a
is bringing Sarah Stone to your office in SF in themarket segment worth going after by individual
late 1980s. You had a baby Mac and were justphotographers?  How big do you think that
starting to play around with Photoshop. Imarket is?
remember you asked me if I knew where youEllen: I disagree with the $20 billion figure. Is that
could get some photos of clocks to put into yourDan Heller’s? I think it is and when I read his
photos. Free or cheap photos…so you were onlogic (I may not remember it correctly so Dan
the cutting edge of needing microstock anddon’t get on your high horse!) I felt it was
didn’t even know it. Neither did I.faulty. For now I recommend that photographers
 Since those days I have worked at Corbis aswho have general collections of average
Executive Editor, was the first employee atquality…ok admit it…there is always average in
Artville’s photo collection after it wasevery field…put that work in microstock. I
purchased by Image Bank, part of the initial teamdon’t feel comfortable recommending trying
that started Workbookstock, was the firstto reach the world of users from the high school
employee at UpperCut Images and had a briefblogger to the church website via direct sales
and very unsatisfactory stint at SuperStock. Sinceunless the workflow is completely seamless. Even
2006 I have worked as a sole proprietor offeringso, I don’t think most professional
appraisal services (valuation of future revenuephotographers will want to deal with the traffic
streams from stock photography collections), asthat opening the doors completely will cause. The
an expert witness and consultant on generalprice expectations are so low that they might find
stock photography issues at Dreamstimethemselves always answering emails and phone
(microstock) and to individual emerging andcalls in regard to lowering license fees. The goal
seasoned stock photographers. Currently I’mshould be to get a certain kind of work into
writing a book based on the 100+ blogs I wrotemicrostock, other types in a high end rights
at Dreamstime.managed collection or license that directly.
I’ve gone from rights managed to royaltyI actually recommend that some images go on
free to microstock. I guess you could say thatflickr under the Creative Commons copyright. I
I’ve seen it all.have some compelling research that shows that
John: Years ago I heard Tony Stone give afor some, this is a way to build reputation and
speech in which he said that “Someday aactually make money. I hope to be able to
huge meteor will hit the earth and stockpresent this and some other information about
photography as we know it will cease tounusual places to license images at a seminar in
exist”.  Is that meteor getting close?  Couldthe fall at PhotoExpo. 
it be Micro?John: To be able to effectively monetize those
Ellen: Rather than a large meteor hitting andand other markets as individuals, outside of
exploding the world, destroying stocktraditional agencies, photographers will need tools,
photography, as Tony knew it back before hespecifically web tools, to deal with distributing their
left the industry, the change is more like a benignimages, handling licensing and sales, and tracking
growth. As it grows bigger and bigger it becomesabuse.  One possible answer to that need is
invasive and can be as deadly as a malignantImageSpan.  Do you know if ImageSpan could be
tumor.a viable solution, and do you know of any others
The industry has made the mistake of creatingon the horizon?
too many of the same images over and overEllen: ImageSpan just announced the 2.0 version. I
again. This is because instead of nurturing thehad an early preview by the ImageSpan staff and
photographers who have vision to combine bothwas very impressed. They have seemingly
art and commerce to produce unique imagesthought of everything. Of course, photographers
within the standard salable subjects, they letstill have to do their own marketing to drive
creative decisions be driven by previous salestraffic to the site but the services provided by
results and creative research based all on theImagespan are sensitive to SEO.
same sources. This has resulted in a glut ofJohn: Traditional shooters fear the demise of the
images that all look alike. I like to call them theindustry because of Micro.  Micro shooters are
image de jour…everyone runs out and shootsstarting to feel the demise of their world by the
the same style and subject with the same lookentry of traditional shooters into Micro. Do you
on the same day, it appears.think that traditional shooters need to be in Micro?
I believe that one reason that microstock hadDo you think that the entry of traditional shooters
explosive growth aside from the price point wasinto Micro Stock is going to “ruin it” for
that users could find one-of-a-kind images. Nowthe Micro shooters?
that the major production companies are puttingEllen: I think it is a mistake for traditional RM/RF
the same old, same old but ‘new’ imagesshooters to have put high production value
into micro in great volumes, the same problemimages into microstock. It is very difficult to
could arise there.make back investment on an expensive shoot
John:  I am hearing predictions that Google is theeven if the resulting images are on multiple
ultimate stock search mechanism, and thatmicrostock sites.  Plus if higher paying clients can
someday all the searches will be done on Googleget the same material on micro, why would they
image search…even including Agencypay more? Now the toothpaste is out of the tube
collections.  Can you comment on that?and there is no going back. Clean simple images in
Ellen: I don’t know the answer. What I doall the popular genres do very well on micro and
know is that Google has taught us all how tothat is where they belong.
search. We no longer look for anything with justJohn: What do you see the stock industry looking
one or two words. The vast amount oflike two years from now?  Five years from
information on the web compels us to becomenow?
more and more specific in our use of searchEllen: More direct sales. In five years? Maybe the
terms and to use more words in a search. Thisonly stock businesses are companies that add
knowledge spills over into how we search forvalue by scouring the web for the best work
images. I believe that photographers withwithin a genre….sort of back to photo research
collections on specific subjects and who haveservices.
implemented best practices as far as SEO goesJohn: What advice would you give any shooter
may find that they can make more money sellingwho wants to make a living shooting stock in
stock direct than with a stock company in thethese turbulent times?
near future.Ellen: Think of your business as a multi-layered
Today I am excited about the prospect that wecake. Get your work into all the layers of the
may be at a convergence of technology and userbusiness. DEVELOP a specialty and be the best at
behavior that will shortly enable photographers toit in the world. Even photographers on microstock
license their existing images.sites need to build their brands within the site in
John: I have heard estimates that theorder to get maximum downloads.
non-traditional market for stock photography,John: Is there anything else you would like to
made up of those who buy and/or license photosshare with us?
outside of the traditional infra-structure of stock,Ellen: Buy my book to be issued by Watson Guptill
is as big as $20 billion a year.  Even if that(Random House) next year.