Must Be Some Camera

I have been asked countless times, "Wow, whatpictures. Camera quality, at this basic level of
type of camera do you use?", or "Must be somephotography experience, does indeed play an
camera that you have". or "My camera doesn'timportant factor. Their logical conclusion is: the
take pictures like that", etc. One time in particular,better the camera the better the print.
a gentleman was looking at my work in my boothWhat these individuals do not understand is that,
at an art show and said something along the linessometimes, there is more than meets the eye
of, "Sure must be a great camera you have towhen it comes to photography and fine art prints.
get these great pictures".The camera is simply a tool - a very important
I looked at him for a moment, and respondedone at times for sure - but it is just one of many
with a smile, "No. Actually, it was some greatvariables that come into play when producing a
photographer who did this." The expression on hisfine art print of the utmost quality. The real
face gave me the feeling that he was thinking"magic" comes from the printing. It is with the
that I was trying to pull one over on him, and heprinting that the artist's intent fully comes to life.
smiled while responding, "Sure, but it still bust haveThe camera is just a tool used to move one
been a great camera!" He was fully expecting mealong the path towards the final destination that is
to reply, "Yes, you caught me - I have the bestthe print. A bad print from a Hasselblad can be
camera in the world and that is the only reasonworse than a good print from a cell phone
why these prints look so good."camera.
My actual response was, "I am sorry, but it is notI am selling the final print - I am not selling based
just the camera. In fact I can produce beautifulon the camera I used. If I "fooled" someone into
work with any camera, even yours." His smilethinking that I used a Hasselblad, is it now all of a
dropped and he looked me in the eyes and said,sudden an inferior print once known a Hasselblad
"Come on, you use a Hasselblad." I replied, "I amwasn't used?
sorry to tell you that you are wrong, but you areIs it worth less?
wrong. I do not use a Hasselblad camera." At thisMaybe it should be worth more!!
point, the conversation was over - he thought IPrinting is the most important part of the process
was flat out lying to him and the only reason whyfor me, and the part that consumes the most
I have the quality I have was because I used aamount of time. Countless hours of work go into
Hasselblad camera.each and every one of my prints. While there are
What this individual was not able to comprehend issome images I am able to print with only a few
that the camera is just one of many tools for thehours of work, others have taken months (not
photographer. It is not the end all, be all.continuous, fortunately) to produce a print I am
Is it the high end kitchen utensils that popular chefcompletely satisfied with. I even have one photo
Emeril uses that makes his dishes so renown?that I worked on, from time to time, over the
Take him into your kitchen. Would he be able tocourse of a full year before I was satisfied with
produce a meal far superior to yours using yourthe print!
own utensils - utensils that may not be the "bestI wasn't bothered by that gentleman walking out
in the industry"?of my booth convinced, in his own beliefs, that I
Part of the misconception of, "the better thesimply had a "really good" camera. In fact, it was
camera, the better the photo," comes from thea compliment to my printing, technique,
basic fact that nowadays just about everybodyexperience, composition, vision, creativity, and, the
has a camera. Everyone has experience takingleast of which, the camera I used. A great
photos. And yes, everyone takes some photoscamera is not going to make a great
that perhaps they even surprise themselves withphotographer.
by the way the print turns out. But not as manyI will write future articles discussing the methods
prints come out as great as they would like.and procedures I use in doing my own printing.
What's the most obvious thing to blame - theirFor those not interested in that, and only want to
technique? No. It is definitely the camera thatfocus on the camera I use, I will tell you that I
took the bad photo. The print doesn't lookcurrently use a Canon 5D Mark II camera. It is a
anything like what they remember. They assume21 megapixel digital camera. It's not a top of the
if they purchased a better, more expensiveline camera, nor is it a bottom of the line camera.
camera, they would get better photos.But boy, you should see the pictures this camera
So they buy a more expensive camera and findtakes...
that, yes, they are now sometimes getting better