French Impressionism In The Heart Of Paris

It's safe to say that for many of us, when wecalculated clarity, Pissarro's more fluid depictions of
think of the centuries of art that have served toParisian gardens and Montmartre's wide boulevard,
fix Paris as the cultural capital of Europe, whatrendered in feathery brushstrokes and riotous
comes to mind above all else, perhaps even thecolor, have become nearly synonymous with our
soaring towers of Notre Dame and the Place denotion of Impressionism.
la Concorde's gold capped obelisk, is the work ofWhereas Pissarro and Sisley favored broad
the French Impressionists. Manifesting a sense ofvantages and vistas, the work of Pierre-Auguste
urban bustle that is unexpectedly punctuated byRenoir (1841-1919) and Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
moments of aesthetic sublimity, it is no wonderreflects a more embedded perspective. Renoir's
that these painters of light have come to define asun-dappled parks and outdoor cafes often
collective and indelible visual representation of theappear to overflow with joyful crowds of
City of Light's true vibrancy.Parisians, successfully conveying the tension
The term impressionism began as a critical slightbetween observation and inherent participation
leveled at artists such as William Turner and Johnthat is unique to life in the city. Degas, as well, is
Constable, whose atmospheric compositions wereoften preoccupied with crowds, but uses their
often dismissed by academicians as unrefinedenergy to explore movement and gesture. Even
daubing. In 1872, however, Claude Monethis more stoic portraits, exemplified by the iconic
(1840-1926) attempted reclamation of the insultL'absinthe, tend to be filtered through idiosyncratic
by titling his seminal portrayal of the Englishperspectives (a technique undoubtedly influenced
Channel at sunrise Impression, Soleil Levant. Whileby the advent of photography) that force the
the designation remained, it is interesting to noteviewer into the scene.
that the artists we now group together as theAs the effects of light, atmosphere and
Impressionists did not emerge in the latermovement became increasingly dominant in the
decades of the nineteenth century as awork of these artists, the subject, for the first
movement united by a singular manifesto. Rather,time in the history of Western art, began to
they became aligned by the influence of Edouardapproach irrelevancy, an idea that would become
Manet (1832-1883), whose stark rejection ofthe dominating agenda of Modernist practice for
Romanticism's nostalgic tendencies became theyears to come. Of all the Impressionists, it was
wellspring of modern painting. Through highlyClaude Monet (1840-1926) who was most willing
individualized approaches the Impressionists soughtto explore the subjugation of the object for the
to convey a reflection of the truly contemporary,sake of visual perception. In 1877 he began a
achieved by embracing their immediateseries of paintings depicting the Gare Saint-Lazare,
surroundings and emphasizing visual resonanceone of Paris' busiest railway stations. What sets
over intellectual inference.these works apart from his earlier paintings, and
Often credited as the fathers of what hasperhaps those canvases produced during his later
become characteristic Impressionist technique,years at Giverny, is Monet's increased attention to
Camille Pissarro (1831-1903) and Alfred Sisleythe light as refracted through both the station's
(1839-1899) began experimenting with plein-airglass ceiling and the billowing steam from the
painting, forgoing endless studio revision forlocomotives, thereby transforming the very
on-the-spot interpretations of the transientsymbol of the industrialized age, the engine, into
effects of sunlight on the landscape. While Sisley'spure color.
paintings often capture light with a masterfully